In & Out of Amsterdam: Travels in Conceptual Art, 19601976
Museum of Modern Art July 19, 2009 – October 5, 2009
While the Belgian painter James Ensor continues to enthrall a large audience on the top floor of the Museum of Modern Art, a much humbler display can be found further below. Visually, the exhibitions could not be more different, and yet In & Out of Amsterdam: Travels in Conceptual Art, 1960–1976 possesses a satirical wit similar in spirit to that of the Belgian master. Though made more than 60 years after Ensor’s most prolific period by a young generation rejecting traditional art practices, the two shows share an affinity for documenting the everyday environment with a touch of self-deprecating detachment.
As is the case with much conceptual art, the approximately seventy-five works by the ten artists here are odd, offbeat and often thrillingly intelligent. They are elegant and restrained in their visual complexity, made with simple materials and technology. They embody the core belief that art can spring from the ordinary at any moment. As a whole, the works gathered by curator Christophe Cherix establish a vivid portrait of Amsterdam during the 1960s and 1970s, when the city became a haven for an array of international avant-gardists, especially Americans and Europeans, thanks to the Stedelijk Museum’s pioneering contemporary art program, an emerging gallery scene, and the city’s progressive sociopolitical policies.
While the exhibition’s focus on one specific locale and timeframe (1960-1976) make it something of a niche project, it nevertheless illustrates the versatility and richness of post-Duchampian conceptual thought during that era. Works by lesser-known artists such as Bas Jan Ader, Ger van Elk, Allen Ruppersberg, and Charlotte Posenenske, as well as those by the more prominent Hanne Darboven, Jan Dibbets, Gilbert & George, Sol LeWitt, and Lawrence Weiner, seem to foreshadow ideas tackled in the 1980s and 1990s by such neo-conceptualists as Cindy Sherman, Damien Hirst, Tracy Emin, or Martin Creed.
Some of the most intriguing works are based on performance. In two short films from 1970, entitled “Fall 1” and “Fall 2”, Bas Jan Ader topples from a chair perched on the roof of his Los Angeles home and rides a bicycle into the Reguliersgracht canal. Ger van Elk’s equally comical slide projection entitled “Paul Klee-Um den Fisch, 1926 (Paul Klee—Around the Fish),” also from 1970, in which he eats a fish dinner modeled on Paul Klee’s still-life painting Um den Fisch (1926, Collection of the Museum of Modern Art), comments on the faux-elite status of Modernism. Born in Germany to a Jewish family in 1930, Posenenske focused on works that shifted between minimal and conceptual ideas. Her display at MoMA consists of an installation and two photographs from her so-called “Vierkantrohre (Square Tubes)” series. Looking like ventilation shafts, these sculptures were conceived as modules that could be adapted to any space and context. In 1968, convinced that art could no longer influence social interaction, Posenenske stopped working as an artist and devoted the rest of her life to sociology.
One of the most elegant bodies of work in the exhibition is by Sol LeWitt. Besides a large, magnificent wall drawing, he is represented by a sequence of cutouts derived from a map of Amsterdam, which are dated by year, month and day. The title of each cutout describes its exact location, such as “Map of Amsterdam Between the Stedelijk Museum, Julianapark, Strawinskylaan, the Corner of Hillegomstraat and Duinstraat and Koningspaleis.” The abstraction of the city is twofold, translated first into a map and then transformed into distinct geometric shapes. The distinct description provided by each work’s title and date, however, offers very real associations with specific buildings, seasons, and the distances between locations. For “The Shortest Day at my House in Amsterdam” (1970), the Dutch artist Jan Dibbets organized eighty color photographs into a grid, each showing the same view from a multi-paned window in Dibbet’s Amsterdam home at the time. Organized in sequence, the progression of the day and its changes of light are revealed incrementally if viewed one at a time, but in a dramatic sweep if seen overall. It is an effect that has been used often by several artists, but Dibbet’s work is a rather poetic example of the passing of time frozen in still frames.
While some of the works in this exhibition were shown at their place of origin at the time they were made, most have not been seen since or, for that matter, presented in the US. Conceptual art often defies a quick survey because the significance of the work grows in accordance with the viewer’s comprehension of its background and the issues it addresses. Hanne Darboven’s extensive installation of 100 mechanically printed books is a case in point. The books are displayed on tables, each representing a year in a century. Spread open with empty pages facing up, they are transformed into an ocean of white paper crests. They also mark the serial accumulation of invisible, inaccessible data. It is as if the history and the knowledge of a whole century have evaporated into nothingness.
“In & Out of Amsterdam: Travels in Conceptual Art, 1960–1976” is a show for an audience with a long attention span, and those who take the most time will find plenty that will prove rewarding.
The Academy MuseumBy Edward Mendez
MARCH 2022 | Film
Driven by its mission to advance the understanding, celebration, and preservation of cinema, the Academy Museum addresses film history through its dynamic and educational exhibitions.
New York Food ExhibitionsBy Mary Ann Caws
OCT 2022 | ArtSeen
As I write, there is at the Museum of the City of New York, a gigantic and vividly colorful exhibition entitled Food in New York: Bigger Than the Plate, which opened on September 16 to great acclaim in the newspaper and radio.
Visiting the Acropolis MuseumBy Krzysztof Wodiczko
DEC 22–JAN 23 | Special Report
Wounded, mutilated, and dismembered by wars, ancient war sculpturessuch as these of heroes of Persian, Trojan wars and embattled mythological godsare perceived by the Museum visitors as romantic ruins of idealized antiquity, rather than as the horrifying forensic evidence of wars atrocities and as the masterpieces of war art implicated in cultural perpetuation of such atrocities through their aesthetic sanctification of armed violence.
96. A second-floor gallery on Mercer and Prince Street, a studio in a former synagogue on Hester StreetBy Raphael Rubinstein
APRIL 2022 | The Miraculous
At the age of 31, an artist walks into a SoHo gallery containing only a single worka 35-foot-long abstract paintingand begins to feel almost physically sick. He has been deeply affected by the political movements of the previous decade (feminism, civil rights, war protests) and realizes that he doesnt want to go on making big paintings. He cant stand the thought of one of his paintings ending up in a bank lobby or even in a museum.